Comparison

DraftAria vs Harvey

Harvey: a broad legal AI platform for drafting, document analysis, research and workflows. DraftAria focuses on the last mile: getting a document court-formatted, checked against the court’s rules and ready to file, with tools for everyone on the team who handles it. Many firms could reasonably use both.

Last reviewed: October 2026. Every statement about Harvey links to a public source.

Book a demo Jump to the comparison table

Who it’s for

Who each product is for

Harvey

Law firms, corporate legal departments and professional service firms.^[7]

DraftAria

Litigation teams where attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants and docketing staff all touch a filing before it goes out.
Solo and small-firm attorneys who prepare and file their own documents.

Credit where due

What Harvey does well

A broad platform: Assistant for questions, document analysis and drafting; Vault for storing and bulk-analyzing documents; Knowledge for legal, regulatory and tax research; and prebuilt or custom Workflows.^[1]
Microsoft 365 integrations: a Word add-in for drafting, playbook reviews and in-document answers, plus Outlook and SharePoint/OneDrive.^[2]
An iManage integration; Harvey is listed as an iManage technology partner.^[3]
A strategic alliance with LexisNexis (announced June 18, 2025) that brings LexisNexis primary law content and Shepard’s Citations into Harvey, with co-developed workflows.^[4]

Where DraftAria differs

Built for getting a filing out the door

Tools for each role on the team

Separate tools for attorneys (Aria for Attorneys), paralegals and legal assistants (workflow checklists, service lists, certificates of service, cover sheets) and docketing (deadlines and docket entries), not only a single chat box.

Court-formatted templates

Templates start from the court: caption, table of contents and table of authorities placeholders, signature block and certificate of service, following the court’s formatting requirements.

"Ready to File" checks without AI

Filing checks compare your document with stored court rules (page limits, formatting and required parts). They are rule-based and do not send your document to an AI model.

Court rules watched every week

Every Monday an automated job checks 209 official federal court and national-rules websites for changes to local rules and standing orders, and reports changes for a person to review.

Citations are never invented

Aria is instructed not to fabricate authority. Where a citation is needed and not supplied, drafts use a [CITE AUTHORITY] placeholder, and uncertain citations are flagged for review.

Court requirements in DraftAria are labelled “Not yet verified” until a reviewer has checked them against the court’s own rules. Read how we check court rules every week and our Trust Center.

Being honest

Where Harvey is ahead

Maturity: an established platform with a much broader feature set than ours today.^[1],[7]
Research content through the LexisNexis alliance, including Shepard’s Citations.^[4]
Enterprise certifications: Harvey reports SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. We have not completed either.^[5],[6]
Integrations that are live today: Word, Outlook, SharePoint and iManage. Our Word add-in is in development and iManage is planned.^[2],[3]

See the current status of our integrations and what we haven’t done yet.

Side by side

Comparison table

DraftAria compared with Harvey
Feature	DraftAria	Harvey
Court-formatted filing templates	Yes: captions, TOC/TOA placeholders, signature blocks, certificates of service	Not stated publicly
Formatting checks against court rules	Yes: rule-based "Ready to File" checks; the document is not sent to AI. Court requirements are labelled "Not yet verified" until reviewed	Not stated publicly
Watching official court rules sites for changes	Yes: 209 federal sources checked every Monday; changes go to a person for review	Not stated publicly
Tools for paralegals, legal assistants and docketing	Yes: paralegal workflow, service lists, certificates of service, deadlines, docketing	Not stated publicly
Citation approach	Never invents citations; [CITE AUTHORITY] placeholders; uncertain citations flagged. Automated citation lookup (CourtListener) is in development	LexisNexis content and Shepard’s Citations available in Harvey^[4]
Legal research content	No: DraftAria is not a research database	Yes: Knowledge (legal, regulatory, tax) and LexisNexis content^[1],[4]
Microsoft Word add-in	In development	Available: drafting, playbook reviews, in-document answers^[2]
Document and practice management integrations	iManage and NetDocuments planned	iManage; SharePoint/OneDrive^[3],[2]
SOC 2 / ISO 27001	Not yet: no audit completed	SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001^[5],[6]

“Not stated publicly” means we did not find it in Harvey’s public materials when we reviewed them; it does not mean the product lacks it. Last reviewed: October 2026.

Sources

Last reviewed: October 2026. DraftAria facts come from our own product; see the Trust Center and Integrations.

See DraftAria on a court you file in

We’ll generate a court-formatted template and run a filing check on a sample document, so you can judge the difference yourself.

Book a demo Other comparisons

Harvey and other product names are trademarks of their respective owners. DraftAria is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by any of them. Information about other products comes from their public materials and press coverage, listed under Sources; it may have changed since we last reviewed it. If something here is out of date, please tell us at support@draftaria.com and we’ll correct it.